<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Xdg-Desktop-Portal on WhyNotHugo</title><link>https://whynothugo.nl/tags/xdg-desktop-portal/</link><description>Recent content in Xdg-Desktop-Portal on WhyNotHugo</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:32:54 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://whynothugo.nl/tags/xdg-desktop-portal/posts.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Understanding the XDG access portal</title><link>https://whynothugo.nl/journal/2023/06/20/understanding-the-xdg-access-portal/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://whynothugo.nl/journal/2023/06/20/understanding-the-xdg-access-portal/</guid><description>The upcoming version of Firefox 116 will use Pipewire for camera access. This sparked my curiosity and I wanted to know if my setup would work for this. In recent times, Firefox has been moving rather quickly, adding dependency on these Flatpak portals (even in scenarios where Flatpak is not involved). This is no exception.
Access to the camera via pipewire is mediated by the camera portal, an interface of the xdg-desktop-portal.</description></item></channel></rss>